📋 Credit Summary — Pre-Interview Brief
Evi Meiwatiningsih · KTP: 32010141XXXXXXXXXX ·
Generated: 11 May 2026, 05:14 WIB
Recommendation
Approved
Risk: Very High ·
Internal Score: 250/100 ·
Eligibility: PROCEED_WITH_CHECKS
Analyst Decision: Rp 0 for 24 months · Reviewed by fauzan@flin.co.id · Notes: hjvjvhj
Applicant Profile
Eligibility Check (10 Hard Rules)
| Rule | Required | Actual | Status |
| Loan Amount Band | > IDR 20 million |
IDR 77,000,000 |
✓ Pass |
| Primary Ratio Gate (TOIR/FOIR) | TOIR ≤ 130% OR FOIR ≤ 60% |
TOIR=129.2%, FOIR=46.0% |
✓ Pass |
| Residential Geography | Bandung / Surabaya / Jabodetabek (Bali excluded) |
KABUPATEN BOGOR, JAWA BARAT |
✓ Pass |
| Minimum Education | ≥ Senior High School (SMA) |
D3 |
✓ Pass |
| Employer Type | State-Owned / Government / Private |
SWASTA |
✓ Pass |
| Employment Contract | Permanent / Karyawan Tetap |
KARYAWAN TETAP |
✓ Pass |
| Employer in business > 5 years | > 5 years |
Manual verification required |
◎ Manual |
| Tenure in Current Company | ≥ 1 year |
4 years |
✓ Pass |
| Total Work Experience | ≥ 3 years |
10 years |
✓ Pass |
| Minimum Salary | > IDR 7,000,000 |
IDR 12,400,000 |
✓ Pass |
Income & Loan Request
Loan Reconciliation (Customer / Bureau / Bank)
| Source | Outstanding | Monthly EMI |
| Customer Declared |
Rp 77,000,000 |
Rp 0 |
| Bureau (AFPI + CLIK) |
Rp 844,744,266 |
Rp 0 |
| Bank Statement (avg/mo loan payments) |
— |
Rp 5,700,000 |
⚠️ Customer underdeclared debt:
Customer declared Rp 77,000,000 but bureau shows
Rp 844,744,266 —
gap of Rp 767,744,266. Probe in interview.
AFPI Bureau Analysis
43 loans ·
Rp 137.401.302 outstanding ·
5 Pinjol(s)
Loans by Pinjol (top 15 by outstanding)
| Pinjol | Loans | Outstanding |
| Danabijak | 1 | Rp 91.686.635 |
| Gopay Later / Gopay Pinjam | 7 | Rp 17.800.000 |
| Julo | 2 | Rp 15.416.667 |
| Indodana | 32 | Rp 12.498.000 |
| YUP Paylater / Samakita | 1 | Rp 0 |
Loan Status Count
Collectibility Status Count
| Bucket | Count |
|---|
| DPD 1-30 | 3 |
| DPD 0 | 38 |
| DPD 61-90 | 1 |
| DPD 90+ | 1 |
Collectibility × Loan Status (Count)
| L | O |
|---|
| DPD 0 | 38 | — |
| DPD 1-30 | — | 3 |
| DPD 61-90 | — | 1 |
| DPD 90+ | — | 1 |
Collectibility × Loan Status (Outstanding Loan Value)
| L | O |
|---|
| DPD 0 | Rp 0 | — |
| DPD 1-30 | — | Rp 33.216.667 |
| DPD 61-90 | — | Rp 12.498.000 |
| DPD 90+ | — | Rp 91.686.635 |
Year × Loan Status (Count)
Year × Collectibility Status (Count)
| DPD 0 | DPD 1-30 | DPD 61-90 | DPD 90+ |
|---|
| 2023 | 28 | — | — | — |
| 2024 | 7 | — | — | — |
| 2025 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 1 |
CLIK Bureau Analysis
52 loans ·
Rp 707.342.964 debit balance ·
DPD mean 0.15, max 8.0 days
Secured: 3 loans, Rp 371.074.010 ·
Unsecured: 49 loans, Rp 336.268.954 ·
Total disbursed (Initial Credit Limit): Rp 1.205.022.283
CLIK — Combined (secured + unsecured)
Contract Phase × DPD Bucket (count)
Contract Status × DPD Bucket (count)
| Current | DPD 1-89 |
|---|
| Active Facilities | 51 | 1 |
DPD Bucket × Debit Balance (sum)
| DPD Bucket | Debit Sum |
|---|
| Current | Rp 698.166.065 |
| DPD 1-89 | Rp 9.176.899 |
Contract Phase Count
Debit Balance per Contract Type Code
| Type Code | Sum |
|---|
| Others | Rp 404.383.375 |
| Credit Card | Rp 103.022.824 |
| Credit to third parties through other agencies by channeling | Rp 71.330.963 |
| Cash Loan - Non Fintech (i.e. Banks) | Rp 60.098.154 |
| Others - Fintech | Rp 46.018.476 |
| Loans for joint financing (Syndication) | Rp 12.447.392 |
| Buy Now Pay Later (BNPL) - Non Fintech (i.e. Banks) | Rp 10.041.780 |
Debit Balance per Provider Type Code
| Provider Code | Sum |
|---|
| Financing Company | Rp 368.795.469 |
| Conventional Commercial Bank | Rp 292.529.019 |
| Fintech | Rp 46.018.476 |
| Islamic Banks (Unit Usaha Syariah - Syariah Business Unit) | Rp 0 |
CLIK — Secured
Contract Phase × DPD Bucket (count)
Contract Status × DPD Bucket (count)
| Current |
|---|
| Active Facilities | 3 |
DPD Bucket × Debit Balance (sum)
| DPD Bucket | Debit Sum |
|---|
| Current | Rp 371.074.010 |
Contract Phase Count
Debit Balance per Contract Type Code
| Type Code | Sum |
|---|
| Others | Rp 358.626.618 |
| Loans for joint financing (Syndication) | Rp 12.447.392 |
Debit Balance per Provider Type Code
| Provider Code | Sum |
|---|
| Financing Company | Rp 358.753.689 |
| Conventional Commercial Bank | Rp 12.320.321 |
CLIK — Unsecured
Contract Phase × DPD Bucket (count)
Contract Status × DPD Bucket (count)
| Current | DPD 1-89 |
|---|
| Active Facilities | 48 | 1 |
DPD Bucket × Debit Balance (sum)
| DPD Bucket | Debit Sum |
|---|
| Current | Rp 327.092.055 |
| DPD 1-89 | Rp 9.176.899 |
Contract Phase Count
Debit Balance per Contract Type Code
| Type Code | Sum |
|---|
| Credit Card | Rp 103.022.824 |
| Credit to third parties through other agencies by channeling | Rp 71.330.963 |
| Cash Loan - Non Fintech (i.e. Banks) | Rp 60.098.154 |
| Others - Fintech | Rp 46.018.476 |
| Others | Rp 45.756.757 |
| Buy Now Pay Later (BNPL) - Non Fintech (i.e. Banks) | Rp 10.041.780 |
Debit Balance per Provider Type Code
| Provider Code | Sum |
|---|
| Conventional Commercial Bank | Rp 280.208.698 |
| Fintech | Rp 46.018.476 |
| Financing Company | Rp 10.041.780 |
| Islamic Banks (Unit Usaha Syariah - Syariah Business Unit) | Rp 0 |
Credit Ratios
| Metric | Value | Band | Benchmark |
| TOIR (Post-Consolidation Affordability) PRIMARY |
129.21% |
Amber |
≤ 100% Green | 100-130% Amber | > 130% Red (gate: TOIR ≤ 130% OR FOIR ≤ 60%) — (FLIN EMI + secured EMI + expenses + rent) / declared income |
| FOIR (Fixed Obligations / Income) PRIMARY |
45.97% |
Amber |
< 40% Green | 40-60% Amber | > 60% Red (gate: TOIR ≤ 130% OR FOIR ≤ 60%) |
| Debt-to-Income (Annual) |
567.70% |
Red |
< 300% Green | 300-500% Amber | > 500% Red |
| Total Debt / Annual Income |
5.68x |
Red |
< 3x Green | 3-5x Amber | > 5x Red |
| Residual Monthly Income (post all outflows) |
Rp 1,700,000 |
Red |
> IDR 5M Green | 2-5M Amber | < 2M Red |
| Bank-detected vs Declared Income |
120.50% |
Green |
≥ 90% Green | 75-90% Amber | < 75% Red |
Bank Statement Category Pivot (Top 12 by Volume)
| Category | Month 1 | Month 2 | Month 3 | Avg/Mo |
| Salary |
Rp 0 |
Rp 0 |
Rp 0 |
Rp 14,944,806 |
| Loan Payment |
Rp 0 |
Rp 0 |
Rp 0 |
Rp -5,700,000 |
| Z Pegadaian |
Rp 0 |
Rp 0 |
Rp 0 |
Rp 2,398,535 |
| Miscellaneous - Arisan |
Rp 0 |
Rp 0 |
Rp 0 |
Rp -500,000 |
| Groceries |
Rp 0 |
Rp 0 |
Rp 0 |
Rp -71,000 |
| Bank Charges |
Rp 0 |
Rp 0 |
Rp 0 |
Rp -17,000 |
Occupational & Profile Check
LLM knowledge estimate · no live web evidence
⚠ Verify before relying
Employer · HBT Law Firm
Confidence: Unknown
| Profile | Unknown - no information available about this Indonesian law firm in training data. |
| Industry | Unknown |
| Industry risk for credit | Unknown |
| Headquartered in | Unknown |
| Employee count band | Unknown |
| Company vintage | Unknown years |
| Stability signals | Unknown |
| Sources known to model | — |
Applicant · Evi Meiwatiningsih
Confidence: Low
| Found in training data | No |
| LinkedIn signals | None known |
| Google signals | None known |
| Estimated seniority | Junior |
| Tenure observation | 4+ years tenure as Admin Assistant appears reasonable for career progression |
| Declared income (IDR/mo) | Rp 12,400,000 |
| Expected range for role | Cannot estimate - insufficient data on Indonesian law firm admin salaries |
| Plausibility verdict | Cannot assess |
| Comment | IDR 12.4M monthly for admin assistant seems high but cannot verify without market data |
Policy Implications (high-confidence only)
| Category | Severity | Note |
| Income sanity | Medium | Declared income appears elevated for admin assistant role but cannot be verified without employer/market data |
Disclaimer: No information available about HBT Law Firm or applicant in training data. All assessments require verification through alternative sources.
Risk Factors
| Category | Severity | Description |
| Bureau |
High |
Massive debt underdeclaration: Customer declared IDR 77M but bureau shows IDR 845M total outstanding (997% gap). Multiple active paylater loans with severe delinquencies including Danabijak IDR 91.7M in DPD 90+ status. |
| Bureau |
High |
Current payment stress evident: 5 active delinquent accounts across multiple paylater providers (Gopay, Julo, Indodana, Danabijak) with DPD ranging 1-90+ days. |
| Application |
High |
Fraudulent application behavior: Systematic concealment of 91% of actual debt burden suggests intentional misrepresentation to obtain additional credit. |
| Banking |
Medium |
Pegadaian transaction (IDR 7.2M inflow) suggests pawning assets for liquidity, indicating financial distress despite regular salary. |
| Income |
Medium |
Income verification concerns: IDR 12.4M monthly for admin assistant role appears elevated but employer 'HBT Law Firm' cannot be verified in available data. |
Executive Summary
STRONG DECLINE RECOMMENDATION. This application exhibits severe red flags including massive debt concealment (997% underdeclaration), active payment stress across multiple paylater providers with one loan in DPD 90+, and systematic misrepresentation. The customer is already severely overleveraged with DTI of 568% and is showing signs of financial distress (pawning assets). Approving this consolidation would likely result in immediate default and re-leveraging behavior. The risk of fraud and willful default is extremely high.
Interview Question Bank (14 questions)
Verification
-
Can you confirm your current residential address and how long you've lived there? Who else lives in the household?
Why: Verify address stability and household composition for contact purposes
-
Please describe your role as Admin Assistant at HBT Law Firm and provide your direct supervisor's contact details.
Why: Verify employment and enable employer reference check since firm is not in our database
-
What is the full legal name and address of HBT Law Firm, and how many employees work there approximately?
Why: Verify employer legitimacy since no information available in our systems
Debt Background
-
You declared IDR 77 million in existing loans, but our bureau check shows much higher amounts. Can you explain this discrepancy and provide a complete list of ALL your current debts?
Why: Address the massive 997% debt underdeclaration and assess honesty/fraud risk
-
Your Danabijak loan of IDR 91.7 million is currently 90+ days overdue. What happened and what steps are you taking to resolve this?
Why: Understand the severe delinquency and current payment capacity
-
Why did you accumulate so many paylater loans (Gopay, Julo, Indodana, Danabijak) and what was the money used for?
Why: Assess spending behavior and risk of re-leveraging after consolidation
Income
-
Your salary appears high for an admin assistant role. Can you break down your total compensation including any bonuses, allowances, or overtime pay?
Why: Verify income sustainability since IDR 12.4M seems elevated for the role
-
Are there any upcoming changes to your employment, salary, or working arrangements at the law firm?
Why: Assess income stability for loan repayment capacity
-
Do you have any other sources of income besides your salary from HBT Law Firm?
Why: Identify additional income sources that could support repayment
Expense Validation
-
You declared IDR 5 million monthly expenses. Please break this down by category - household, food, transportation, utilities, family support, etc.
Why: Validate expense estimates and identify potential cost reduction areas
-
We see regular Arisan payments in your bank account. How much do you contribute monthly to social/community groups?
Why: Quantify social obligations that may compete with loan payments
Future Plans
-
We noticed a large Pegadaian transaction in your account. Did you pawn any items recently and why?
Why: Understand liquidity stress and asset pawning behavior indicating financial distress
-
If we approve this consolidation, how will you ensure you don't take additional loans or credit in the future?
Why: Assess re-leveraging risk given history of accumulating multiple debts
-
Do you have any assets, savings, or expected lump-sum payments that could help with debt repayment if needed?
Why: Identify backup repayment sources given current payment stress
System-generated pre-interview brief. All figures subject to verification.
Final decision rests with the credit officer.
Generated: 2026-05-11T05:14:19.794779